Hello again,
My service business model now revolves around the Renishaw Equator, which requires a master part in one fashion or another. I’m creating programs, fixtures, performing MSAs, setting up SPC on the customer’s floor, and sending parts to the lab for calibration as master parts. These parts will require markings which we will likely perform using a laser, possible some sort of escapement feature that ensures the part doesn’t make it into circulation. The programs sometimes require serial number tracking. This all screams AS9100D, and that’s fine. we’re well on the way.
What about ISO/IEC 17025? Is it enough that we keep calibration records for when an ISO 17025 certified lab completed the calibration of the master part? I see AS13003A is about MSA, but I’ve worked in aerospace shops that did not have that standard or the certification. Is that something I should look into if I’m doing MSA for aerospace shops?
Bottom line, for anyone using calibrated master parts for their inspections, are you referencing any specific standards when managing calibration data?
Add: I needed this
submitted by /u/skunk_of_thunder
[visit reddit] [comments]
Source link